You stop at the red light and see the crash coming in your rearview mirror before you feel the jolt from the rear-end impact. In most rear-end accident cases, fault lies with the driver who failed to stop in time to avoid the crash, but in this case, you had a broken taillight. Can you still seek damages? An Atlanta personal injury lawyer can answer your questions and fight for compensation.
Georgia is one of 12 states operating under a modified comparative negligence system for personal injury claims and follows a 50% bar rule. Under this rule, victims can only pursue damages if they are less than 50% to blame for the accident. This guide explains modified comparative negligence, how it is applied in Georgia compared to other states, and how it affects potential settlements and trial awards.
$32 Million Wrongful Death
$26 Million Truck Accident
$20 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident
$17.5 Million Car Accident
$4.4 Million Settelement reached for Car Accident case.
$12 Million Work Injury
$11 Million Truck Accident
$9 Million Truck Accident
$8 Million Truck Accident
$8 Million Truck Accident
$7.5 Million Auto Accident
$6.9 Million Garbage Truck Accident
$6.5 Million Traumatic Brain Injury
What Negligence Laws in Georgia and Other States Mean for Personal Injury Claims
Except for South Dakota, each of the 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, operates under one of four types of personal injury systems.
Georgia follows a modified comparison with a 50% bar. Pennsylvania also follows modified comparison, but with a 51% bar. New York has a pure comparative system, allowing victims even 99% at fault to file for damages. North Carolina follows contributory negligence, only allowing victims who hold 0% of the blame to recover damages.
South Dakota’s slight versus gross negligence system follows modified comparison principles. Instead of using a 50 or 51% bar, the court differentiates between categories of negligence. If the plaintiff’s negligence is categorized as “slight” and the defendant’s as “gross,” the plaintiff can seek damages. If the plaintiff’s negligence is greater than “slight,” they may not be allowed to recover their losses.
Negligence System | States Following It | Damage Recovery Rule | Effect on Damage Amounts |
Modified Comparative (50% bar) | Georgia, Utah, Illinois, and 9 others | Plaintiffs cannot recover damages if they are 50% or more at fault. | 50% to blame = no damages 49% or less to blame = proportionally reduced compensation |
Modified Comparative (51% bar) | Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Oregon, and | Plaintiffs cannot recover damages if they are 51% or more at fault. | 51% to blame = no damages 50% or less to blame = proportionally reduced compensation |
Pure Comparative | California, New York, Rhode Island, and 11 others | Plaintiffs can recover damages even if they are 99% at fault. | No bar on pursuing damages Compensation reduced in proportion to percentage of fault 90% to blame = 10% recovery |
Contributory Negligence | D.C.,Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Alabama | Plaintiffs cannot recover damages if they hold any percentage of fault. | 1% or more to blame = not eligible for damages |
Slight vs. Gross Negligence | South Dakota | Plaintiffs may recover damages if their level of negligence is “slight.” | Slight negligence = eligible for recovery. Damages reduced in proportion to percentage of fault |
How Georgia’s Laws Compare to Others
Georgia’s comparative negligence law is not as victim-friendly as pure comparative systems, but it offers more hope for compensation than contributory negligence states. If you owned 10% of the fault for an accident in Virginia, you would get no compensation. In Georgia, you could recover 90% of the damages. If you owned 70% of the fault for an accident in New York, you could get 30% of the damages, but in Georgia, you would get nothing.
Implications of Georgia’s Modified Comparative Negligence Laws in Personal Injury Cases
In personal injury cases, the party seeking compensation for accident-related losses is called the “plaintiff.” According to Georgia’s system for apportionment of damages established in statute § 51-12-33 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (O.C.G.A), plaintiffs are only eligible to fight for damages if they hold less than 50% of the fault for the incident.
Still, plaintiffs often hold somewhere between 0 and 49% of the blame. Under Georgia’s system, a victim who is more than 0% but less than 50% at fault is eligible to fight for damages, but the amount they recover is reduced by their fault percentage.
Examples of Modified Comparative Negligence in Action
Consider a scenario in which your damages amount to $100,000. You hold less than 50% of the blame for the accident and are entitled to collect compensation. If you are:
0% at fault, you collect 100% of your damages, totaling $100,000
25% at fault, you collect 75% of your damages, totaling $75,000
49% at fault, you collect 51% of your damages, totaling $51,000
If you bear 50% or more of the blame, you cannot collect any compensation. The 50% bar is a critical threshold and the most important element of Georgia’s modified comparative fault system.
Georgia’s Modified Comparative Negligence Laws Affect Strategies for Settlement Negotiations and Trial Outcomes
Munley Laws’ 65 years of representing injury victims and working within Georgia’s court system has shown us how even a 5% difference in fault assignment can change settlement negotiations and trial outcomes. We are well prepared to keep your fault allocation to a minimum and work to get you the highest compensation possible.
Settlement Negotiations
Some personal injury claims resolve through settlement negotiations. During these discussions, attorneys and insurance adjusters determine fault. Each side presents evidence and arguments until coming to an agreement on fault ownership and settlement amounts. A settlement agreement is more probable when victims clearly hold a lower percentage of blame. When shared blame is closer to 50%, it can be more difficult for the sides to reach a consensus.
Insurance companies will work aggressively to inflate your level of fault and use the comparative negligence system to their advantage. If they can put 50% of the fault on you, they do not have to pay you anything. If they can’t reach the 50%, any percentage of blame they can put on you reduces their payout.
Adjusters may also use the law as leverage. They might tell your attorney they will claim you hold 60% of the blame, even if this percentage is high, but will “work with you” and settle if you agree to 40%. They could threaten to take you to court if you do not agree. Trials are a more expensive and time-consuming path to justice.
An Example of Settlement Negotiation Strategy
For an accident claim with damages totaling $150,000, settlement negotiations could play out as follows:
The insurance company offers a settlement of $105,000 ($150,000 X 70%), assigning you (the victim) 30% of the fault.
Your attorney counters, claiming you hold only 10% of the blame, and demands $135,000 ($150,000 X 90%).
Negotiations continue within the 10%- 30% range.
At the end of productive negotiations, the sides ultimately reach an agreed-upon settlement amount.
Court Battles
If negotiations are not productive, and the claim goes to trial, the jury determines fault after hearing all the evidence. The judge oversees the process, making sure all parties uphold legal standards and instructing the jury on personal injury law.
At trial, you must prove the at-fault party’s negligence with a “preponderance of the evidence.” Simply stated, the evidence must show the at-fault party is “more likely than not” responsible for the incident.
The at-fault party must provide evidence of your comparative negligence, with the same standard applied.
A Trial Outcome Example
After considering all the evidence, the jury:
Calculates the victim’s total damages at $200,000
Assigns you (the victim) 30% of the blame
Awards a judgment of $140,000 ($200,000 X 70%)
Either side can appeal the trial verdict, but fault determinations are difficult to overturn. An appeal only succeeds by showing no reasonable jury could have reached the original trial conclusion.
Evidence Influences Determinations of Fault
Your attorney and representatives for the other side will conduct exhaustive investigations into the accident. Each side’s goal is to compile evidence of the other side’s negligence. Forms of evidence often include:
Police reports: Though not conclusive, the reports are influential
Witness statements: Views from “outside” can capture important details
Physical evidence from the accident site: Such as skid marks or vehicle damage for motor-vehicle crashes or hazardous conditions for slips or falls
Photo or video footage: From traffic, security, or dashcams
Cell phone records: May show the other driver’s distraction
Toxicology reports: May show the other driver’s intoxication
Input from accident reconstruction specialists: Their analyses can pinpoint the cause of the accident
Traffic violations: Can establish a presumption of the other driver’s negligence
For motor-vehicle accidents, one side may boost its claim by showing the other side committed a traffic violation. The Georgia Division of Public Safety lists vehicle violation codes, including those for:
O.C.G.A. § 40-6-49: Following too closely
O.C.G.A. § 40-6-70: Failure to yield right-of-way
O.C.G.A. § 40-6-123: Texting while driving
O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391: DUI laws
The party who violates a safety statute creates a presumption of negligence. The burden of proof shifts to them. That party must explain why, despite the violation, they were not negligent.
Real-World Applications of Comparative Negligence
Even when you have some fault, Georgia law may still allow substantial recovery. Never assume you can’t pursue a claim. Instead, connect with Munley Law for experienced, effective representation.
Scenario 1: Rear-End Collision with Brake Light Out
You’ve stopped at a red light and have a broken taillight. The driver following you is texting, fails to see you have stopped, and rear-ends you. The defense could argue that your broken taillight contributed to the accident. You failed to maintain your vehicle and made it difficult for the driver behind you to detect your stop.
Rear-end accidents usually present clear liability situations, with the driver who commits the rear-end crash holding culpability. A likely outcome of this case is that you will recover 85-95% of your damages. You share in the blame, but the other driver bears more.
Scenario 2: Intersection Crash – Disputed Traffic Signal
The light is yellow and turning red as you enter an intersection and crash with another driver who claims they had a green light. You could be assigned anywhere from 0-100% of the blame depending on whose story is more believable. Evidence, including traffic camera footage, witness statements, and traffic-light timing data can all contribute to the story.
As a strategic move, the opposing side may look to settle somewhere close to the 50% mark to avoid going to trial.
Scenario 3: Pedestrian Hit in Crosswalk While Distracted
You’re crossing a street lawfully, through the crosswalk, but you are looking at your phone. An oncoming driver fails to yield and hits you. Under Georgia Statute § 40-6-91, pedestrians have the right-of-way in crosswalks but still must still practice “ordinary care” to protect themselves.
The driver may argue you contributed to the accident by taking your eyes off your surroundings. A pedestrian accident lawyer can help you challenge that accusation. A probable outcome is that you are assigned 10-25% of the blame, but still recover most of your damages.
Scenario 4: Drunk Driving with Minor Plaintiff Violation
You are a 16-year-old driver with a provisional license. You are driving 10 miles per hour (mph) over the speed limit when a drunk driver hits you. The driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC) measures as 0.15 — well over the legal limit. The drunk driver may try to reduce their culpability by saying your speed contributed to the crash.
Driving drunk is an egregious act of negligence. Speeding 10 mph over the limit is not, and probably did not, contribute to your accident. A likely outcome is that you see 0-10% of the fault, and even then, you may have grounds to seek punitive as well as compensatory damages.
How Modified Comparative Fault Applies Under Special Circumstances
No two cases are ever exactly alike, and some come with especially unique circumstances. We are equipped to handle whatever challenges or special differences your case presents.
Claims Involving Multiple Defendants
Some accidents have more than one at-fault party. Georgia allows for apportionment of blame, as long as victims are less than 50% at fault, they can collect from each party according to that party’s determined percentage of fault.
For example, “Driver A” may hold 60% of the blame, and “Driver B” 30%. The victim is 10% at fault, perhaps for not taking greater measures to avoid being hit. The victim can still recover 90% of their calculated damage total from the other drivers, according to those drivers’ respective percentages of fault.
Claims Intersecting with Workers’ Compensation Situations
When you sustain an injury through a work accident, you recover your medical costs and lost wages through Georgia’s workers’ compensation system. Modified comparative negligence laws do not apply to workers’ compensation, and you cannot file a personal injury claim against your employer.
If the blame for the accident falls on a third party, not your employer, you may have grounds to file a claim. For example, if you drive for work but another driver causes an accident, you could potentially file a third-party claim against that driver.
The same could apply if a defective power tool caused your on-the-job construction accident. The produce manufacturer may be to blame. In these situations, comparative negligence would apply to those claims.
Accidents Leading to a Wrongful Death
A loved one could die in an accident or later pass away from injuries sustained in the incident. Their preventable death could provide grounds for filing a wrongful death claim. Comparative negligence laws apply.
If your loved one was 50% or more to blame for the accident causing their death, neither their survivors nor their estate can recover damages. This high level of fault allocation is more common in single-vehicle accidents and DUI cases.
Accidents With Victims Who Are Minors
Some victims are minors. The court applies modified comparative negligence standards for young plaintiffs, but adjusts how that standard applies in light of the child’s age. Younger children are less likely to receive a high determination of negligence.
You Need an Experienced, Strategic Georgia Personal Injury Attorney for Comparative Negligence Cases
For a successful outcome, comparative negligence cases demand the skillful, effective management an experienced attorney provides. After forming a legal partnership with you, the team at Munley Law will:
Investigate your accident
Gather evidence to minimize your fault assignment and support the at-fault party’s negligence
Challenge arguments against you from the at-fault party’s insurance adjusters and representatives
Present evidence to show you had no pre-existing conditions the other side may use to inflate your level of fault
Recognize when to settle, and when to proceed to trial
Anticipate from experience how Georgia juries often assess fault, and present evidence accordingly
The difference between a 49% and 50% fault allocation is the difference between recovering your damages and being left with nothing. For a $200,000 case, 49% can still get you $102,000 in damages. With a 50% assignment of fault, you get nothing. Securing legal representation from Munley Law can help make a difference in your favor.
Munley Law Puts Your Best Case Forward
The team at Munley Law is ready to take your claim through Georgia’s modified comparative negligence system and fight for the most favorable outcome possible. We never cut corners and always put your best case forward. To arrange your free case consultation, connect with us today. The sooner we can get to work, the faster you can see results.
Munley Law Personal Injury Attorneys
1764 Rockland Dr SE
Atlanta, GA 30316
(404) 949-8249
Get Directions
