Proving freight broker liability in truck accident cases is not always simple. Many crashes involve more than just the driver and the trucking company, and in some cases, the company that arranged the shipment may also share responsibility. When a broker hires an unsafe carrier, that hiring decision can become part of the case.
At Munley Law, our truck accident lawyers have handled cases where the broker’s decisions were just as important as the driver’s mistakes. We can review the details of your case, identify all potentially responsible parties, and help you pursue fair compensation for the damages you have suffered. Contact us today to schedule a free consultation. There is no fee unless we win your case.
What Does a Freight Broker Do?
A freight broker does not own trucks and usually does not employ drivers, either. Instead, the broker acts as a third party. 
A shipper hires the broker to move freight. The broker then selects a motor carrier to haul that load. The carrier provides the truck and the driver, and the broker arranges the deal and handles the paperwork.
Under federal law, brokers must register with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). When a company registers with FMCSA, it receives identifying numbers.
- A USDOT number is a unique identifier used to track safety records, inspections, and crashes.
- An MC number (Motor Carrier number) grants operating authority to transport freight or arrange transportation.
Brokers must obtain operating authority and maintain a surety bond or trust fund as financial security.
You can confirm whether a company is registered as a broker through the FMCSA’s Safety and Fitness Electronic Records system (SAFER) and registration database. By searching a company’s USDOT or MC number, you can determine whether it has broker authority, motor carrier authority, or both.
A broker arranges transportation. A motor carrier transports freight. Understanding this distinction matters and can help determine whether it is legally possible for a broker to be responsible for a crash claim.
Contact a Truck Accident Lawyer at Munley Law
Call Us At 844-686-5397 How Broker Liability Works in a Truck Crash
In many cases, a broker argues that it is just a paperwork company. It claims it did not control the driver or operate the truck. But courts look beyond labels.
A broker can be liable if it was negligent in choosing the motor carrier. This is often called freight broker negligent hiring or negligent selection of a motor carrier.
If a broker hires a carrier with a known history of safety violations, crashes, or out-of-service orders, and that carrier causes a crash, the broker may also be held legally responsible. The theory is not that the broker caused the driving error, but that it should not have hired an unsafe company in the first place.
At Munley Law, we handled a case that resulted in a $4 million settlement against a truck broker and shipper that selected a negligent trucking company. The carrier had a poor safety record that could have been found through basic FMCSA checks. That failure became central to the case.
The Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act and Preemption
Freight brokers have long argued that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA), 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c), bars state negligence claims against them entirely. The statute prohibits states from enforcing laws “related to a price, route, or service of any broker.” For years, brokers used that language to get personal injury claims dismissed before trial.
That defense is no longer available. In Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, decided May 14, 2026, the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the FAAAA does not preempt state negligence claims against freight brokers who negligently hired unsafe motor carriers. The Court held that state laws imposing a general duty of care are not the kind of economic regulation the FAAAA was designed to protect, and that nothing in the statute shields brokers from accountability when their hiring decisions put dangerous trucks on the road.
For truck accident victims, this ruling removes one of the last escape routes brokers have used to avoid liability. A broker who reviewed a carrier’s safety record, saw a pattern of violations or out-of-service orders, and hired them anyway can now be held to answer for that choice in court. The preemption argument that defense teams built cases around for nearly three decades has been closed.
Daniel Munley of Munley Law discussed the implications of Montgomery on SiriusXM Road Dog Trucking Radio in June 2026, noting that the ruling fundamentally shifts the accountability landscape for broker-involved crashes.
What is Negligent Selection of a Motor Carrier?
In these cases, the focus shifts to what the broker knew or should have known when it hired the carrier.
FMCSA makes safety information public. Safety ratings, out-of-service rates, inspection data, and crash histories are available through their databases.
If a carrier had repeated violations for hours-of-service rules, brake problems, or driver qualification issues, and the broker ignored that history, that evidence may support a negligent hiring claim.
In these cases, we often look at:
- The carrier’s safety rating
- Prior crashes
- Out-of-service percentages
- Insurance limits
- Any prior warnings or complaints
A broker-carrier agreement may also show what responsibilities the broker assumed. Some agreements contain language requiring carriers to maintain certain safety standards. If the broker never verifies those standards, that can matter.
How Broker-Carrier Agreements Affect Liability in a Truck Accident Case
Defense teams often argue that brokers have no control over drivers and point to language in the broker-carrier agreement stating that the carrier is an independent contractor.
But contracts are not magic shields.
Courts may look beyond the contract language to see how the relationship worked in practice:
- Did the broker pressure the carrier to meet unrealistic delivery times?
- Did the broker continue using a carrier with a pattern of safety violations?
- Did the broker require specific routes?
If the broker exercised significant control, this can strengthen the argument that the broker is responsible for a crash.
Even in the absence of direct control, negligent selection alone may be enough to support a trucking broker lawsuit.
What FMCSA Records Reveal About Brokers and Carriers
Understanding the paperwork helps build the case.
Motor carriers must obtain a USDOT number and, in many cases, an MC number from FMCSA. Brokers also must register and secure operating authority. While those requirements may seem technical, they help define each company’s legal role in the transportation chain.
When we investigate a crash, we review the records closely. We look at whether the broker was properly registered, whether it maintained a valid bond, whether the carrier’s USDOT number was active, and whether either company had prior enforcement actions.
These details can show whether federal requirements were followed. They can also reveal warning signs that were ignored long before the crash occurred.
Why Broker Liability Matters in Catastrophic Truck Crash Cases
Truck crashes often involve catastrophic injuries. A single tractor-trailer can cause brain injuries, spinal damage, or fatalities. These risks are not limited to multi-vehicle collisions, as serious outcomes can also occur in other roadway situations involving large vehicles and vulnerable road users.
Motor carriers must carry minimum liability insurance under federal regulations, generally at least $750,000 for most interstate carriers transporting non-hazardous freight.
In serious crashes, that policy may not cover the full loss.
When a broker shares responsibility, it can open additional insurance coverage. Some brokers carry contingent liability policies, while others have general liability policies that may apply depending on the legal theory asserted.
That is one reason why the question of whether you can sue a freight broker is so important in high-value cases.
Identifying Every Responsible Party in a Truck Crash
Truck crash cases often involve multiple layers of liability. Identifying all responsible parties can strengthen the claim, but each must be supported by evidence.
At Munley Law, we approach these cases by mapping out every entity involved in the load. That includes the shipper, the broker, the motor carrier, and sometimes, maintenance contractors.
In one trucking case, our firm obtained a $26 million settlement for a driver who suffered a traumatic brain injury. In another case, we secured a $4 million settlement against a freight broker for a truck accident. These cases required a detailed investigation into company policies, safety records, and corporate relationships.
Broker liability is not present in every case. But when it exists, it can significantly affect the outcome.
Why Do Freight Broker Cases Require Experience?
Broker cases involve federal statutes, regulatory databases, and evolving court decisions. They require understanding how FAAAA preemption works and how the safety exception applies.
Munley Law has three attorneys board-certified in Truck Accident Law by the National Board of Trial Advocacy—Marion Munley, Daniel Munley, and Katie Nealon. Munley Law is the only firm in Pennsylvania with three such certifications.
Marion Munley is a member of The Summit Council and the American Board of Trial Advocates. She currently serves as Vice President of the American Association of Justice and was the first woman to lead its Trucking Litigation Group. Daniel Munley also served as Chair of that group. Both Marion and Daniel Munley are board-certified by the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys and serve on its Board of Regents.
These certifications are awarded based on demonstrated experience and qualifications in commercial motor vehicle litigation.
Talk To a Lawyer at Munley Law About Freight Broker Liability Truck Accident Claims
Freight broker cases are not standard car crash cases. They require an investigation into federal records, contracts, and safety histories.
If you believe a broker may share responsibility, speak with a lawyer who handles complex trucking litigation.
Munley Law offers free consultations and works on a contingency fee basis. There is no fee unless we recover compensation for you.
Contact us today; we are available 24/7.
Daniel W. Munley
Daniel W. Munley is an award-winning personal-injury attorney and champion of plaintiffs’ rights. For decades he’s won multi-million verdicts and settlements and is recognized as a national leader in truck and rideshare litigation, including a record $26 million truck settlement in Northeastern Pennsylvania and a $20 million recovery in 2024 for life-altering commercial-vehicle injuries.
