What is a Loss of Consortium?
A loss of consortium is the loss of benefits of a family relationship because of injuries caused by negligence.
According to Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute (LII), loss of consortium is defined as “a claim for damages suffered by the spouse of an injured party as a result of injury to the spouse.” As such, it demonstrates the recognition of the impact of injuries on familial relationships and the legal basis for seeking compensation for such losses. It is a legal claim typically made by a spouse or family member of an injured person seeking compensation for the loss of love, companionship, support, and affection that resulted from the injury or death.
Typically, loss of consortium occurs during a major act of negligence such as a car accident or building collapse that results in death. Loss of consortium claims examine intangible losses sought for the emotional impact of injuries on the spouse or family member, rather than financial losses. Understanding loss of consortium is essential in personal injury and wrongful death cases to ensure that spouses and family members receive recognition and compensation for the profound emotional and relational impacts of injuries or losses caused by negligence or wrongful acts. Legal professionals play a critical role in advocating for these damages on behalf of their clients, emphasizing the importance of preserving and compensating familial relationships in civil litigation.
More information about Loss of Consortium
How Can I Prove My Pain and Suffering?
The effects of an accident, whether it is a car wreck, slip and fall, medical error, or workplace accident, can have lasting effects on the victim. Debilitating physical injuries and emotional trauma can plague the victim for years to come.
Pain and suffering refers to physical discomfort and emotional toll the victim faces after an accident. These “non-economic damages” accompany the victim after an injury and can include physical pain, discomfort, mental anguish, inconveniences, and emotional distress.
Pain and suffering claims tend to be a bit more complicated than a regular injury claim. You will need a team of pain and suffering lawyers behind you in order to prove you are owed compensation for your trouble. This is where the personal injury lawyers at Munley Law Personal Injury Attorneys come in. They have a deep knowledge of Pennsylvania law and insurance policies and will fight for the proper amount of compensation for your pain and suffering following an accident. […]
Read MoreMore information about Loss of Consortium
How Much is Pain and Suffering Worth in a Slip and Fall Accident?
Understanding Pain and Suffering After a Slip or Fall Accident
How Much is Pain and Suffering Worth in a Slip and Fall Accident? Slip and fall accidents can happen to anyone, at any time – from a friend’s front stairs, to your local grocery store, and your place of work – hazardous environments are all around and can cause serious harm to victims. Adults, 65 and older, are particularly vulnerable to slips and falls. In fact, over 3 million older adults are treated in hospital emergency rooms every year for slip and fall accidents.
If you or your loved one were a victim of a slip and fall accident, you may be entitled to compensation not only for immediate medical expenses, but for pain and suffering as well. Pain and suffering describes both the physical and emotional injuries a victim suffers following a slip and fall accident. […]
More information about Loss of Consortium
Understanding damages in a personal injury case
How are damages determined in a personal injury case? What kinds of damages can I be compensated for?
Victims who were hurt by car crashes, truck collisions, workplace accidents, medical malpractice, asbestos exposure, or defective products can file lawsuits to recover for damages. The term “damages” refers to the amount of money that those victims are awarded to compensate for the financial losses, pain, and suffering that their injuries caused.
What Is the Difference Between Economic and Non-economic Damages?
They are two main types of damages in personal injury cases: economic damages and noneconomic damages.
Economic Damages can be thought of as the concrete financial costs caused by an injury. Examples of economic damages include the costs of medical treatments, procedures, medications, surgeries, and hospital stays, wage losses, loss of earning capacity, […]
Read MoreMore information about Loss of Consortium
Auto Accidents Caused by Defective Roads
Sometimes it is the road that is at fault in an auto accident. Defective road conditions can cause a driver to lose control of his/her car, leading to an auto accident that can result in serious personal injury or death. But when the road is at fault, who is responsible for your injuries?
Roads in Pennsylvania are the responsibility of either the state or local municipalities. Although Pennsylvania’s Sovereign Immunity Act generally bars suits against the Commonwealth and other government entities, dangerous conditions on highways created by potholes, sinkholes or similar conditions are exempt from sovereign immunity.
The Pennsylvania defective road condition attorneys of [firm-name] believe that when hazardous road conditions lead to accidents, injury, or death, the responsible government agency and/or a private contractor that worked on the road should be held accountable. The victims of accidents caused by unsafe roads deserve full and fair compensation for their injuries and losses. […]
Read MoreMore information about Loss of Consortium
San Diego Man Awarded $2.4 Million in Asbestos Exposure Lawsuit
A San Diego Navy Veteran who was diagnosed in 2010 with mesothelioma, an asbestos-caused cancer, was awarded $2.4 million in damages after his disease was found to be attributed to his work in ship boiler rooms.
The lawsuit, filed against John Crane, Inc., claimed the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos while serving in the Navy from 1961 to 1971 in his work in the maintenance and repair of boilers, pumps and valves. The suit claimed John Crane made some of the asbestos-containing packing material and gaskets in the equipment.
The total damages of about $2.4 million include nearly $1.4 million in noneconomic damages and $450,000 for loss of consortium. The jury found John Crane five percent liable, the Navy and insulation companies 57 percent at fault, some manufacturers and suppliers 37 percent at fault. The plaintiff himself was found to be one percent at fault. […]
Read More
